Logic, method and subjectivity in the controversy between Heidegger and Neokantism

The main purpose of the investigation is to analyze the controversy between Heidegger and Neokantism around three key points. The first of them is the problem of “pure logic” and, more precisely, the debate about Psychologism. Without neglecting the unavoidable reference to Husserl, we are going to attain in particular to the relations of Heidegger with the Neokantian tradition of Baden school in respect to the problems of judgment and the theory of value. Lotze, Rickert and Lask are the philosophers to be considered. The second point is the one of philosophical method and, more specifically, the opposition between transcendental method and the existencial-phenomenological one as a way of answering to the problems opened by the Kantian Legacy. In this case, we will be dealing with the ideas of Cohen, Natorp and Windelband, as well as the Cassirer-Heidegger disputation in Davos. This controversy will also be considered under the third point of the project: The problem of the subject. Here we are going to study the strain between the Heidegger’s conception of Dasein and a logical-transcendental interpretation of subjectivity.

Members: Dr. Hernán Pringe (Director) Dr. Bernardo Ainbinder (Codirector) Lic. Marcos Thisted Dra.Macarena Marey  Prof. Miguel Herzenbaun   Luciana Martínez Jacinto Páez Laura Pelegrín Javier San Sebastián Juan Manuel Vila Pérez

Activities